WHAT DOES GROK SAY ABOUT GARLAND NIXON'S INABILITY TO ACCESS HIS X ACCOUNT?
X CLAIMS THAT THEY CAN'T VERIFY GARLAND AS THE OWNER OF THE ACCOUNT AS THEY CHARGE HIM FOR A VERIFIED ACCOUNT THAT APPEARS ON THE PLATFORM WITH A BLUE "VERIFIED" CHECKMARK
All my articles are free to read, thanks to the generosity of my readers. Independent journalism nonetheless requires investment, so if you value this article or any others, please consider sharing, or even becoming a paid subscriber. Your support is always gratefully received, and will never be forgotten. To buy me a coffee or two, please click this link - to support this work on Patreon click this link - and for cashapp donations use $dcradioman MAIL - P.O. BOX 32 Glen Burnie, Md 21061
ELON MUSK’S OWN AI BOT SAYS THE FOLLOWING:
Garland Nixon's availability on X has been inconsistent due to multiple suspensions and bans, though the exact status of his account as of April 10, 2025, is unclear without real-time access to the platform. Historically, Nixon, a journalist and radio host known for his progressive and anti-imperialist views, has faced restrictions on X for content that appears to violate platform rules or draw targeted scrutiny. For instance, posts on X from 2022 and 2023 suggest he was permanently banned at one point, with users citing reasons like criticizing U.S. foreign policy or allegedly lying about Russia's actions in Ukraine. One claim from August 2023 indicated that Elon Musk banned him, alleging Twitter couldn’t verify his identity despite evidence provided, though this cannot be independently confirmed.
Nixon’s outspoken commentary, often on controversial geopolitical topics, may have triggered these actions, either through automated moderation, user reports, or specific campaigns against him—like a mentioned "Nafo sting operation" in 2022, a term linked to online efforts to counter certain narratives. X’s moderation policies under Musk have been inconsistent, with some arguing they favor free speech and others pointing to selective enforcement, especially on sensitive issues like Israel or Ukraine, as noted in posts from April 2025. Additionally, Nixon’s absence could relate to broader purges, such as a reported ban of 5 million accounts, including Consortium News, around the same time, though specifics about his inclusion are unverified.
Without current platform data, it’s uncertain whether he’s fully banned, suspended, or simply inactive today. His history suggests repeated conflicts with X’s rules or influential users, but sentiment on X indicates he retains support among those who see him as a censored voice of opposition. For the latest status, you’d need to check X directly.
The experience you have suggests to avoid having the fake blue check mark that might get you banned for being who you claim to be.
Twattster has always sucked like any other social media, tis anti social and subject to wanton ScKamala Harris laughter of derision if allowed at all
At least she didn't put you into solitary isolation after you ran against Gruesome Gavin Gruesome Newsom, since you didn't do that, nor have your Grasshopper taxicab business forevermore closed.
Why don't you just sue Elon, who cares what his aye eye says
So…wrong-think essentially. Awesome